Sunday, September 28, 2008
Discussion from Class 9/23
Our group had an interesting discussion about how this book was from one perspective, the Arab side of the Arab/Jewish conflict. Although this is the reason that the book was removed from certain school's curriculums, such as West Bloomfield, it is hard to not tell a story from a certain perspective. I had brought up the point that even American history books are told from our perspective, and probably wouldn't be written the same in other countries. We can only interpret the events that happen from our own perspective, therefore that is how we write and remember them. As long as the book doesn't steer from the actual facts, the emotional issues as to why or how certain individuals are viewed or judged would come from a personal standpoint. Even if the person is an insider to a situation, their view may be different from other insiders, so it is almost impossible to please everyone with your version of the story. This is why we shouldn't necessarily discourage the use of certain books, unless they hold no truth, but rather show other views of the event in order to create our own views.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
Yes, great points you are making here! I also am challenged on the issue of keeping or taking that book away, I think they did not help their students in understanding all sides of this conflict. How will we ever make progress if we don't see others' views? I can see their point, but I would like to challenge it a bit. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
In political thought, Liberalism suggests that an open dialogue is necessary to produce "the truth." This means that even bigoted and skewed opinion need to be voiced in the dialogue-along with different and opposing views. Your comments speak to that.
Holla
The Invisible Man.
Post a Comment